Union City vs Richland
Union City, CA compared with Richland, WA · 616 miles apart
Union City has 65,282 residents to Richland’s 65,258. Union City comes out ahead on median household income, homeownership, poverty rate. Richland does better on median rent, average commute, bachelor's degree +.
| Union City, CA | Richland, WA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,282 | 65,258 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 3,365 | 1,537 |
| Median household income | $133,715 | $95,813 |
| Median home value | $1,104,900 | $436,700 |
| Median rent | $2,713 | $1,468 |
| Homeownership | 64.7% | 64.4% |
| Average commute | 31.9 min | 20.4 min |
| Median age | 43 | 36.4 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 45.1% | 46.6% |
| Poverty rate | 7.2% | 9% |
| Unemployment | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Price to income | 8.3× | 4.6× |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Union City, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Richland, WAClimate, crime, housing