Los Angeles vs Lancaster
Los Angeles, CA compared with Lancaster, CA · 48 miles apart
Los Angeles has 3,869,089 residents to Lancaster’s 170,084. Los Angeles comes out ahead on median household income, average commute, bachelor's degree +. Lancaster does better on median rent, homeownership, poverty rate.
| Los Angeles, CA | Lancaster, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,869,089 | 170,084 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 8,223 | 1,804 |
| Median household income | $81,939 | $81,511 |
| Median home value | $921,200 | $446,600 |
| Median rent | $1,933 | $1,764 |
| Homeownership | 36% | 60.4% |
| Average commute | 30.7 min | 30.8 min |
| Median age | 37.2 | 34.5 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.5% | 20% |
| Poverty rate | 16.5% | 15.6% |
| Unemployment | 8.2% | 7.5% |
| Price to income | 11.2× | 5.5× |
| Clear days a year | 61 | — |
| Days above 90°F | 3 | — |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Los Angeles, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Lancaster, CAClimate, crime, housing