Los Angeles vs Chicago
Los Angeles, CA compared with Chicago, IL · 1,749 miles apart
Los Angeles has 3,869,089 residents to Chicago’s 2,731,585. Los Angeles comes out ahead on median household income, average commute, poverty rate. Chicago does better on median rent, homeownership, bachelor's degree +.
| Los Angeles, CA | Chicago, IL | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,869,089 | 2,731,585 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 8,223 | 11,994 |
| Median household income | $81,939 | $77,902 |
| Median home value | $921,200 | $334,100 |
| Median rent | $1,933 | $1,440 |
| Homeownership | 36% | 46% |
| Average commute | 30.7 min | 33.1 min |
| Median age | 37.2 | 35.8 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 38.5% | 44.3% |
| Poverty rate | 16.5% | 16.8% |
| Unemployment | 8.2% | 8% |
| Price to income | 11.2× | 4.3× |
| Clear days a year | 61 | 21 |
| Days above 90°F | 3 | 11 |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Los Angeles, CAClimate, crime, housing
- Chicago, ILClimate, crime, housing