Kirkland vs Norwalk
Kirkland, WA compared with Norwalk, CA · 976 miles apart
Kirkland has 97,410 residents to Norwalk’s 97,104. Kirkland comes out ahead on median household income, average commute, bachelor's degree +. Norwalk does better on median rent, homeownership, price to income.
| Kirkland, WA | Norwalk, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,410 | 97,104 |
| Density (per sq mi) | 5,471 | 10,004 |
| Median household income | $150,414 | $100,085 |
| Median home value | $1,115,400 | $644,700 |
| Median rent | $2,401 | $2,090 |
| Homeownership | 60.8% | 68.3% |
| Average commute | 23.9 min | 29.5 min |
| Median age | 38.3 | 37.3 |
| Bachelor's degree + | 66.3% | 21.3% |
| Poverty rate | 6.1% | 9.3% |
| Unemployment | 4.6% | 5.7% |
| Price to income | 7.4× | 6.4× |
Highlighted where one city is clearly better on that measure. Population, density, home value and median age carry no highlight — a higher number there is good or bad depending on what you want.
Full profiles
- Kirkland, WAClimate, crime, housing
- Norwalk, CAClimate, crime, housing